Designed to Fail? The UX Crisis in MedTech

You’re lying in a hospital bed, struggling to breathe. Your heart monitor beeps faster. A tired nurse rushes in, scans your vitals, and sees three identical-looking tubes. In the urgency of the moment, she connects the oxygen tube to your IV line — they snap together with a perfect click. But instead of helping you, air bubbles are now flowing straight to your heart.

In another room, a monitor freezes mid-procedure. The timing couldn’t be worse — a system update has taken over, and critical vitals are no longer visible.

Elsewhere, a caregiver tries to use a home device in an emergency. It demands a one-time verification code, but the code won’t generate. There’s no signal. The backup tank is empty, and the nearest hospital is 40 minutes away. The device meant to save a life now stands in the way of it.

These aren’t hypotheticals. They’re everyday failures that highlight a brutal truth: despite its advancements, MedTech is still painfully hard to use.

In healthcare, UX isn’t a bonus. It’s life or death. So why does bad design persist?

Compliance Over Usability

Take the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990. Created to protect patients, it mandates exhaustive documentation and regulatory validation. But in practice, it pushes manufacturers to prioritize compliance over usability.

Devices are built to pass audits, not real-world stress tests. Clinicians often wade through 10 to 20 screens in outdated EHRs (Emergency Health Records) just to access vital information. During critical moments, these delays can cost lives.

When success is measured by checklists and not outcomes, UX (user experience) becomes an afterthought.

Complexity by Design

Healthcare systems are notoriously fragmented — EHRs, EMRs (Emergency Medical Records), imaging software, insurance portals — most built in silos and rarely interoperable. That leads to disjointed workflows, repeated data entry, and dangerous blind spots.

As a result, physicians often spend more time interacting with screens than treating patients. Missed allergies, incomplete charts, and inaccessible records aren’t bugs — they’re features of a fractured system.

This disconnect is further amplified by a growing digital divide within healthcare. On one side are AI-driven optimists promising transformation; on the other, seasoned clinicians who’ve been burned by tools that promised efficiency but delivered chaos. The result is distrust — and a widening gap between what’s possible and what’s practical.

Caught in between are tools that are too complex to be intuitive, too outdated to be helpful. And when design becomes a barrier instead of a bridge, the cost is measured in burnout, medical errors, and lost time. And even when these flawed systems are identified, replacing or improving them isn't easy.

Locked-In and Out of Touch

Now layer on this: most MedTech systems come with massive upfront costs. Some EHRs contracts run into the tens of millions. Once adopted, hospitals are locked in, bound by procurement cycles and long-term contracts that make future UX improvements prohibitively expensive.

These systems are often built far from the point of care, designed by teams who’ve never witnessed a 3 a.m. emergency. Developers build based on assumptions; the tools look polished in demos but fail under pressure.

Over time, staff develop "workarounds" just to survive. Poor usability becomes institutionalised.

The consequences aren’t theoretical:

• A patient wrongfully discharged due to a UI error [source].
• A cancer patient died from dehydration — nurses couldn’t navigate a convoluted monitor [source].

These aren’t edge cases. They’re outcomes of a system that treats design as decoration, not infrastructure.

Who Pays the Price?

Behind every confusing interface is a human burdening its cost.

An overworked ER nurse, a caregiver with no formal training, a patient with low vision or cognitive decline and an admin juggling forms across a dozen outdated portals.

When design fails in healthcare, it doesn’t just frustrate — it endangers. And too often, the most vulnerable users, patients and caregivers, bear the brunt.

So, What Needs to Change?

Fixing MedTech’s UX crisis isn't about surface-level tweaks. It demands a shift in mindset — from designing for compliance to designing for resilience.

Healthcare is unpredictable, high-pressure, and deeply human. Design must meet these realities, not polished workflows crafted in conference rooms.

Here’s what can drive change:

• Involve end users early and often: True insights don't come from assumptions or secondhand feedback. They come from standing next to nurses in the ER, from observing patients with impaired mobility, from listening to exhausted caregivers at home. Co-design isn’t a bonus, it’s survival research.
• Design for urgency: In critical moments, there’s no room for elaborate workflows. Interfaces must work when hands are shaky, rooms are dim, time is vanishing, and users are switching languages or coping with fatigue. Stress isn’t an edge case. It’s the norm.
• Simplify, don’t stack: In healthcare, every extra step, every hidden button, every confusing screen slows people down. Every extra click costs focus. Good design means making things faster, clearer, and easier; not just adding more features.
• Break silos: Fragmented systems aren’t just inefficient, they are dangerous. Devices, EHRs, imaging software, and billing systems must be able to share information seamlessly. If they don't, critical data falls through the cracks and patients pay the price.

These are not nice-to-haves. They are non-negotiables for building a healthcare system that is resilient, responsive, and ultimately, humane.

The Quiet Force That Can Save Lives

UX won’t fix every structural problem in healthcare — but it’s one of the few forces we can act on today. While legislation crawls through years of debate, and infrastructure projects demand millions and disrupt services, design improvements can be rolled out in the systems we already use.

A single UX intervention: a faster login process, a clearer warning message, a more intuitive navigation, can start saving minutes, reducing errors, and easing burnout immediately. It doesn’t require a new hospital wing or a new law. It requires listening better, designing smarter, and prioritizing the people at the center of care.

Good design moves faster than policy. It costs less than ripping out the entire systems and its impact, though quiet, is profound. Reducing mistakes, restoring trust, and giving back the precious resource that healthcare workers and patients are always short on: time.

In MedTech, good design isn’t a luxury. It’s the baseline we should demand.

‍